OPM Insights exists for a practical reason. The principles we describe
elsewhere on this site, such as long-term thinking, responsible
development, and maintainability, are easy to state and hard to apply.
Stating them is not worth much on its own.
These articles are where we set out the reasoning in enough detail to
be useful, and in enough detail to be argued with. They cover the
decisions that come up repeatedly when you are responsible for
building something and then keeping it running: how to tell a
reasonable deadline from a damaging one, when a shortcut is efficient
and when it is debt, where artificial intelligence genuinely helps and
where it quietly introduces risk, and what a business needs in order
to survive an ordinary bad year.
We write from our own practice rather than from surveys or secondhand
summaries. That is a deliberate limit as much as a strength. You will
not find statistics we cannot source, studies we have not read, or
confident claims about what works for every organization. What you
will find is clear reasoning, worked examples of the trade-offs, and
explanations of what we do when the guidance is inconvenient. Where a
question is genuinely open, we say so instead of resolving it
artificially.
The articles are intended to remain accurate rather than to be timely,
so they avoid trends and focus on decisions that will still be recognizable
in several years. We revise them when our thinking changes or when
something turns out to be wrong. If you find an error, the
contact page is the place to tell us, and we
will correct it.